[OPINION] Passing Article 13 in the European Union could potentially end creative content on internet platforms globally

Fair Use allows for the use of copyrighted materials without the permission of the original copyright holder. Uses like criticism and review, news reporting, scholarship, comment, and research are all covered by Fair Use. For example, YouTube allows all creator channels to legally use clips from copyrighted movies, shows, images and songs in their own videos.

In the case of a creator deciding to upload a whole movie onto their channel, Digital Millennium Copyright Act  (D.M.C.A.) comes into action. This act tells the website to take down the illegal use of footage. For example, YouTube is only responsible for taking down the video from their website, they are not responsible for committing the copyright violation—the creator is.

U.S. Fair Use gives examples of uses for copyrighted material, but are not limited to those stated.  The doctrine is flexible to new forms of media—like the rise of memes and vlogs—from its original point of creation in the 1976. In Europe their “Fair Use” is called “Permitted Use.” European creators need permission to use copyrighted works, unless explicitly stated by the copyright owner.

E.U. Permitted Use states that parody, quotation, private copying and classroom use are allowed. Parody in legal terms requires the new work to be directly making fun of the original copyrighted work. Any other uses that are not stated leads to automatic copyright infringement.

Article 13 will only worsen the situation because it targets Safe Harbor in the E.U.

“Online content sharing service providers and right holders shall cooperate in good faith in order to ensure that unauthorised protected works or other subject matter are not available on their services,” as stated in the current version Article 13.

Because of the poor wording in the current version of Article 13 that has the potential to pass in two months, big companies can demand cooperation “in good faith” from small creators because it is under the law.

In this situation, film and music companies can still use their own work, but users on websites like YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr, etc. are directly targeted by the vague language used. Big companies such as Sony Music can then bend the rules in their favor, limiting what content can be put out onto websites. Music, movies and shows are not the only types of content that would be banned. 

This includes every digital image, every painting, every tattoo, and every meme ever posted on any social media platform. This is the content teens produce and post regularly, and will be taken away from us in only a matter of months. 

When companies serve different countries with different laws, they usually cater to the strictest laws, and make that policy reach all who they distribute content with. An example of this kind of policy making occurred earlier this year, when social media companies emailed users about updating their privacy policy. This complied with General Data Protection Regulation (G.D.P.R.) passed by the European Union in May.

In all, passing of Article 13 can and will affect all creators globally, meaning the end of memes.